-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix a problem with datetime format in rule contents #63
Conversation
CI is reporting in
Anyone knows how to solve it? I don't find any other way to check if the rule content is properly parsed than this one in the test case... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🐛 🔫
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
great
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #63 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 33.49% 36.92% +3.42%
==========================================
Files 10 12 +2
Lines 627 734 +107
==========================================
+ Hits 210 271 +61
- Misses 393 436 +43
- Partials 24 27 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Description
Added a new way to parse the datetime format in order to allow the 2 different ones observed (with and without timezone)
Fixes #60
Type of change
Testing steps
Regular CI